Basel III Discord

For the last week and a half, people across the globe have been focused on the London Olympics. The Olympics is a compilation of competitive sporting events that are based on an international set of rules. While the larger countries like the United States, China and Australia have more opportunity to win the most medals, every country is on equal footing for each one-on-one contest. Even the smallest of nations, like Jamaica, can and do win gold medals.

It is truly amazing to witness the best athletes in the world compete, whether they are 15 years old or 71 years old; they have each earned their way to the Olympics by being the best in their country. I believe that the structure of the games treats all countries and all competitors equally and fairly.

Contrast that international event to what community bankers may be facing soon with the Basel III capital rules. The Basel accords I and II were designed on the premise that all international banking transactions should adhere to a common set of rules. Since community banks rarely participate in international transactions, there has never been a need for them to be subjected to Basel agreements.

However, with Basel III establishing capital rules that attempt to weight the relative risk of individual banks, the U.S. banking regulators have determined that all U.S. banks will be subject to at least some parts of the rules. Never mind that the United States is the only country in the world with a vast community bank system. Never mind that our diversified, locally delivered financial services system has created the strongest economic power ever on earth. Never mind that applying portions of Basel III to community banks could seriously disrupt the delivery of financial services, particularly in rural America. And never mind that this action is potentially the last straw for many community banks.

These new interpretations of the Basel III accords by the U.S. regulators is currently out for comment. Comments on this 700-page proposed regulation are due Sept. 7. The ABA, ICBA and IBA are calling upon the regulators to extend the comment period deadline by 90 days. This proposed regulation is so complex that legions of attorneys cannot adequately assess the document.

Please join in this effort to seek a 90-day extension of the comment period by sending a letter to your primary regulator:

OCC banks – email to regs.comments@occ.treas.gov; include “Basel III OCC Docket ID OCC-2012-0008, 0009 and 0010” in the subject line, or write to:
   Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
   250 E Street SW
   Mail Stop 2-3
   Washington DC  20219

Federal Reserve banks – email to regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; include “Basel III Docket No. 1442” in the subject line, or write to:
   Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary
   Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
   20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW
   Washington DC  20551

FDIC banks – email to comments@FDIC.gov; include “Basel III FDIC RIN 3064-AD95, RIN 3064-AD96 and RIN 3064-D97” in the subject line, or write to:
   Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
   Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
   Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
   550 17th Street NW
   Washington DC  20429

Perhaps by working together we can, like the Olympics, treat everyone fairly.

2 Responses to Basel III Discord

  1. Mike Cahill says:

    Joe thanks for getting the word out and pushing all of us to get involved!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: